<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Smart Green Tips&#187; safe sunscreen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smartgreentips.com/tag/safe-sunscreen/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smartgreentips.com</link>
	<description>save a little time, save a little money, save a little planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:39:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Safe &amp; Effective Sunscreens</title>
		<link>http://www.smartgreentips.com/safe-effective-sunscreens</link>
		<comments>http://www.smartgreentips.com/safe-effective-sunscreens#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe sunscreen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smartgreentips.com/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you found this article through a search engine, you might be interested in reading the updated version, Safe &#38; Effective Sunscreens 2010. Wouldn&#8217;t it be nice if we could trust sunscreen labels? It turns out the one I&#8217;ve been using on my children rates a 7 for health hazards in Environmental Working Group&#8217;s Cosmetics [...]<p>
Sponsors:

<a href="http://www.shareasale.com/r.cfm?B=255475&amp;U=322087&amp;M=28169">Studio Press: Genesis & Prose Child Theme</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>If you found this article through a search engine, you might be interested in reading the updated version, <a href="http://www.smartgreentips.com/2010/06/10/safe-and-effective-sunscreens-2010/">Safe &amp; Effective Sunscreens 2010.</a></strong><br />
<img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-397" title="sunburn" src="http://www.smartgreentips.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/sunburn.jpg" alt="sunburn Safe & Effective Sunscreens" width="203" height="240" />Wouldn&#8217;t it be nice if we could trust sunscreen labels? It turns out the one I&#8217;ve been using on my children rates a 7 for health hazards in <a href="http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com">Environmental Working Group&#8217;s Cosmetics Database</a> (7 is bad). Not only that, it&#8217;s not nearly as effective as I thought at blocking the sun&#8217;s rays. Here&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve recently learned from <a href="http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/special/sunscreens2008/summary.php">EWG&#8217;s sunscreen study</a>: &#8220;<em>In a new investigation of 1,095 name-brand sunscreens, the Environmental Working Group (EWG) found that 4 out of 5 sunscreen products offer inadequate protection from the sun, or contain ingredients with significant safety concerns. Leading brands were the worst offenders: None of market leader Coppertone&#8217;s 47 sunscreen products met EWG&#8217;s criteria for safety and effectiveness, and only 1 of 115 products from Banana Boat and Neutrogena, the second- and third-largest manufacturers, are recommended by EWG.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Below are the primary issues, according to <a href="http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/special/sunscreens2008/summary.php">EWG&#8217;s study</a>:</p>
<p><strong>◊  Only 14% of 1,095 products analyzed met EWG&#8217;s criteria for safety and effectiveness.</strong></p>
<p><strong>◊  Many products lack UVA protection.</strong></p>
<p><strong>◊  Sunscreens break down in the sun.</strong></p>
<p><strong>◊  Questionable product claims are widespread.</strong></p>
<p><strong>◊  Many sunscreens contain nano-scale ingredients that raise potential concerns.</strong></p>
<p><strong>◊  The U.S. lags behind other countries when it comes to products that work and are safe.</strong></p>
<p><strong>◊  Some sunscreens absorb into the blood and raise safety concerns.</strong></p>
<p>Fortunately, there&#8217;s some good news. EWG identified 158 sunscreen products that are &#8220;recommended.&#8221; The top picks, that should be readily available in stores, are listed below.</p>
<p><strong>Based on a scale of 0-10, where 0-2 are considered &#8220;low hazard.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">0 California Baby Sunblock Stick Everyday/Year-Round SPF 30+</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">1 California Baby Sunblock Lotion SPF 30+ (Everyday/Year-Round Lotion &amp; Natural Bug Blend)</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">1 Badger Sunscreen SPF 30</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">2 Walgreen&#8217;s Sunblock w/Zinc Oxide for Face, Nose, &amp; Ears SPF 45+</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">2 CVS Sunscreen w/Zinc Oxide SPF 45+</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">2 Trader Joe&#8217;s Sunscreen Lotion SPF 30+</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">2 No-Ad Ultra Sunblock Lotion SPF 60</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">2 Blue Lizard Australian Sunscreen Lotion SPF 30+ (Face &amp; Regular)</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">2 Neutrogena Sensitive Skin Sunblock Lotion SPF 30</p>
<p>For more information, EWG has a handy one page <a href="http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/special/sunscreens2008/ewg_sunscreen.pdf">printable guide</a> [PDF] that includes some of the recommended products and more information about the study. To read the full study, click <a href="http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/special/sunscreens2008/summary.php">here</a>.</p>
<p><em>Photo Credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/44165698@N00/">A. M. Kuchling</a></em></p>
<p>
Sponsors:

<a href="http://www.shareasale.com/r.cfm?B=255475&amp;U=322087&amp;M=28169">Studio Press: Genesis & Prose Child Theme</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smartgreentips.com/safe-effective-sunscreens/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

